Fluoride– The New Lead

I was very pleased to have heard from Dr. Bramhall today giving us permission to post her new article–every sentence is loaded.–Augie

FLUORIDE: The New Lead

By Dr Stuart Jeanne Bramhall

It took decades to “prove” that even low-level lead exposure caused mental retardation and behavioral problems in children. In 1973 when I graduated from medical school, there was a mountain of compelling evidence of the terrible things lead in paint and auto exhaust was doing to kids. However under pressure from corporate interests (the companies who put lead in gasoline and paint), the medical establishment still officially proclaimed that at “subclinical levels,” lead was totally safe.

Fortunately Nixon’s newly created Environmental Protection Agency stood up to the corporate elite in 1973. Taking the emphatic position that even low-level lead exposure was posing a direct threat to public health, they ultimately forced the US auto industry (in 1975) to install catalytic converters in cars, to enable them to run on unleaded fuel. The use of lead-based paint in homes was banned in 1978.

A Regulatory Agency that Refuses to Regulate 
 
Unfortunately, despite overwhelming evidence that fluoride has the same effect as lead in lab animals and children. In 2010 the EPA has virtually ceased to perform any meaningful regulatory function. Which is most unfortunate, given that many US municipalities still put fluoride in the public drinking water (which can’t be removed by simple filtration and is found in many brands of bottled water).

It boggles the mind that communities across the US continue to mass medicate their residents without their consent -” with a substance that has never been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (it’s actually unpurified toxic waste from the agricultural phosphate industry and contains heavy metals and radionucleotides). Not only does this constitute a major civil rights infringement, but it poses far more danger to human health than the TSA full body scanners at airports.

Established Link to Hip Fractures, Bone Cancer and Liver Cancer 
 
The evidence linking water fluoridation to hip fractures, bone cancer, and liver cancer is unequivocal. In 2006, after three years of study, doctors, chemists, toxicologists and other researchers appointed by the National Research Council concluded the preponderance of evidence showed that water fluoridation was causing an increase in hip fractures and bone and liver cancer, in addition to its neurotoxic effects in children (see http://www.fluoridealert.org/nrc-review.htm). They also found strong evidence that it was contributing to an epidemic of hypothyroidism, infertility and arthritis in Americans (1/3 of Americans suffer from arthritis). However they felt more research was needed in these areas. Nevertheless they felt the established health risks were so serious, they strongly recommended all water fluoridation be stopped while additional studies were completed. There is an excellent 98 minute interview with some of these scientists at http://blip.tv/file/2223981/.

Fraudulent Science 
 
One area they didn’t explore, which BBC investigative journalist Christopher Bryson covers in his 2004 book Fluoride Deception, is the systematic way that corporate interests have “doctored” fluoride research. One common practice was to selectively publish research favorable to fluoride, while simultaneously firing and blacklisting scientists whose studies showed otherwise. Scientists who research medical problems related to genetically modified foods face the same problem -” their work is suppressed, while they themselves are fired and blacklisted. Thanks to Bryson others, who obtained dozens of secret documents regarding water fluoridation via the Freedom of Information Act, the full extent of this massive fraud is finally in the public domain.

The Decision to Fluoridate the Public Water Supply 

As Christopher Bryson outlines in Fluoride Deception, the decision to deliberately dose US municipal water systems with a potent industrial toxin was basically a corporate scam dreamed up by Alcoa, General Motors, and DuPont in the thirties and forties – to stem a tide of lawsuits related to death and injuries from toxic fluoride pollution (by convincing the public that fluoride is good for you). Alcoa was involved because fluoride is an extremely toxic pollutant produced by aluminum smelting. GM and DuPont were involved because GM held the patent on fluoride-based Freon (DuPont manufactured it), a common refrigerant which has since been banned. Unsurprisingly the same corporate researchers who “proved” that fluoride was safe also tried to convince the American public that lead, asbestos, smoking and plutonium were safe.

Fluoride Declared Hazardous Waste in 1930 

According to Bryson, scientists have known for decades that fluoride is extremely toxic – in fairly low doses – to all mammals, including humans. In fact the FDA first declared fluoride a serious health hazard in the early thirties. The result was scores of lawsuits by aluminum workers crippled and killed by fluoride poisoning and by farmers near aluminum plants, whose livestock were killed by fluoride emissions.

Public Relations: Cheaper than Pollution Controls 
 
Rather than encouraging his employer to institute pollution controls, an Alcoa researcher named Francis Frary decided a better solution was to alter public perception of fluoride – by convincing Americans that it improved dental health. Frary approached Mellon Institute researcher Gerald Cox, who performed a single study in rats (who don’t really suffer much tooth decay) in 1937 and “proved” that fluoride strengthened teeth. Around the same time, the same Gerald Cox also “proved” that mesothelioma (a rare lung cancer that killed Steve McQueen) wasn’t caused by asbestos.

Back then the concept of peer reviewed research was unknown, and the American Medical Association declared that the “case for fluoride” was proved. It’s clear that corporate largesse (from General Motors) was instrumental in getting the American Dental Association on board with water fluoridation. Whether the AMA also benefited from corporate generosity remains unclear.

Kettering Bribes the American Dental Association 
 
Frary and Cox were soon joined in their little scam by Charles Kettering, who was both GM’s research director and a Freon magnate. Kettering was the first to approach the American Dental Association with their proposal to fluoridate public water systems. He also began funding many of their activities and got appointed to their three member Advisory Committee on Research in Dental Caries.

Meanwhile GM and DuPont hired scientist Robert Kehoe to perform safety studies on both fluoride and tetra ethyl lead, a gasoline additive co-manufactured by the two companies. And for obvious reasons, Kehoe declared both lead and fluoride safe at “low levels.”

Enter the Atomic Energy Commission and the Father of Public Relations 
 
In the 1940s these corporate researchers were joined in their scheme to promote water fluoridation by Dr Harold Hodge the chief toxicologist of the Manhattan Project (the secret US project to build and atomic bomb).Hodge became involved in “Project F” because large amounts of fluoride are used in the construction of the atomic bomb, and the Atomic Energy Commission was concerned about heading off a flood of lawsuits from Manhattan Project scientists exposed to toxic levels of fluoride. This was the same Harold Hodge who, in his role as chief Manhattan Project toxicologist, experimented on unsuspecting patients at Rochester ‘s Strong Memorial Hospital , by injecting them with plutonium.

Nevertheless the most prominent villain in this sordid history of lies and secrecy was the infamous father of the public relations industry (i.e. the sophisticated use of propaganda to sway public opinion) Edward Bernays. There was massive public opposition to water fluoridation from the very beginning -” led mainly by doctors who were well aware of fluoride’s toxicity. Bernays’ answer was to enlist even more prominent doctors to declare it safe, starting with famous baby doctor Benjamin Spock.

A Systematic Corporate Cover-Up 
 
As Christopher Bryson outlines clearly in the Fluoride Deception, the whole notion of fluoride being safe and good for teeth is based on decades of corporations paying researchers to produce the scientific results they want -” and burying research and firing and blacklisting scientists whose studies show otherwise.

As Bryson points out, it was actually mass fluoride poisoning that kick-started the environmental movement, following an air pollution disaster in 1948 that killed 20 people and sickened hundreds more. A temperature inversion and air pollution from a US Steel factory is blamed for the Donora ( Pennsylvania ) Death Fog. However owing to extreme pressure from the steel and aluminum industry, public health authorities colluded in a systematic cover-up of the autopsy results – which revealed that the victims had toxic fluoride levels in their blood (see http://www.fluoridation.com/donora.htm).
GM fluoride researcher Charles Kettering also deliberately suppressed the results of his own lab’s 1962 studies demonstrating that fluoride produced lung damage in beagles.

This sordid history also includes deliberate smear campaigns against extremely reputable doctors and scientists who published research and clinical findings showing that water fluoridation has adverse health effects:

  • Dr. George Waldbott – a world famous doctor who first identified penicillin allergy and the link between smoking and emphysema. Waldbott published numerous double blind studies in the fifties showing that fluoride is harmful to human health. The result was a massive corporate smear campaign that destroyed his reputation by marginalizing and demonizing him.
  • Dr William Marcus – a senior EPA toxicologist in the Office of Water, fired in 1992 for attempting to publicize studies revealing that fluoride causes bone and liver cancer (see http://www.gaia-health.com/articles251/000293-epa-scientists-oppose-fluoridation.shtml). In 1994 Marcus won lawsuit against the federal government and was reinstated. While the EPA still refuses to ban water fluoridation, the unions representing EPA scientists have called for a moratorium (see http://www.nteu280.org/Issues/Fluoride/Press%20Release.%20Fluoride.htm).
  • Dr Phyllis Mullinix – research toxicologist hired by Forsyth Dental Institute to study the effect of fluoride on the brain. In the mid-nineties, Mullinex was first fired and then blacklisted in the when she published research showing that fluoride produces memory and behavior problems in children.

Where Does Fluoride Come From? 
 
Although fluoride is added to municipal water systems as a “drug” – that allegedly improves dental health – it has never been approved by the FDA. In fact most communities source their fluoride from the phosphate fertilizer industry, as hydrofluorosilicic acid. This is an extremely toxic, hazardous waste, and the EPA requires phosphate manufacturers to capture it via “wet scrubbers” in their chimneys (to prevent toxic fluoride gas from being released into the air). The resulting liquid is then loaded, unpurified, into tanker trucks and sold to cities to be added to their public water supply. In addition to fluoride, it also contains a number of heavy metals and radionucleotides (radioactive elements – mainly uranium-238, uranium-234, thorium-230, radium-226, radon-222, lead-210, and polonium-210).

Why 98% of European Communities Have Banned Water Fluoridation 
 
Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Iceland, Italy, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Norway, and Sweden all ban water fluoridation – for five main reasons:

1. The preponderance of independent research reveals that fluoridation (at levels as low as 0.7 parts per million) increases the risk of hip fracture, liver and bone cancer and lowered IQ in children – as well as being strongly implicated in an American epidemic of hypothyroidism, arthritis and infertility. The concentration used in most American cities is 1.0 parts per million.

2. It ‘s an absolute violation of medical ethics for a doctor to prescribe a drug, in unlimited doses (people who eat processed foods or drink large amounts of fruit juice, soft drinks and tea get much higher doses), to someone they have never met, without informed consent or ongoing monitoring of their response.

3. The World Health Organization has compared communities with and without water fluoridation and found the rate of cavities is no higher in communities who don’t fluoridate their water (and doesn’t increase when they remove it). In fact communities who don’t fluoridate seem to have somewhat better dental health. Individuals who accumulate toxic levels of fluoride (known as dental fluorisis) actually have weaker tooth enamel. (Americans have the highest rate of dental fluorosis in the world – 33% overall and 41% in teenagers between 12-15). Research has consistently shown that fluoride only reduces tooth decay when it’s applied directly to the teeth – drinking fluoride weakens the enamel.

4. All medical and dental authorities worldwide agree that infants are at risk of serious fluoride toxicity if their formula is made up with fluoridated water (see http://www.fluoridealert.org/infant-warning.pdf). This poses a real health hazard to low income families, who can’t afford the luxury of distilled water.
5. The vast majority of Europeans don’t want fluoride in their water when the risks are explained to them. (The administration of any drug requires informed consent – and they don’t consent.)

The CDC and Health and Human Services: Too Little Too Late

In January 2011, the Center for Disease Control and US Department of Health and Human Services (http://www.cdc.gov/fluoridation/fact_sheets/cwf_qa.htm) finally acknowledged that water fluoridation is damaging children’s teeth and made the official recommendation that US cities reduce water fluoride concentrations to 0.7 parts per million or below. However this recommendation runs contrary to research evidence making it clear that there is no safe fluoride level for drinking water. What’s even more dangerous about the federal recommendation is its failure to warn parents about using fluoridated water in infant formula. Even at 0.7 ppm, babies fed fluoridated formula will develop fluoride poisoning.

Thus far 60 US communities (as a result of citizen activism) have ended fluoridation of their public water system. For support in getting the fluoride out of your water go to http://www.fluoridealert.org/ There is also an excellent interview with Bryson regarding his book at http://www.fluoridealert.org/bryson.htm.

Dr. Bramhall is a child and adolescent psychiatrist from New Zealand and a first time author with her thrilling book called The Most Revolutionary Act: Memoir of an American Refugee. It has won a 2011 Allbooks Review Editor’s Choice Award. Visit her most interesting blog.

MAKE SURE YOU SUBSCRIBE TO OUR JOURNAL . . . and use the SHARE buttons on this one!


13 responses to “Fluoride– The New Lead

  1. The uptake of lead (and aluminum, mercury) in the brain is vastly accelerated in the presence of fluoride. How much I do not recall but I know it is at least 10x

  2. Thanks Monte for this info. 41% of children are now fluoride poisoned so much it is effecting their teeth–fluorosis

  3. FOI Fluoridated Water Analysis

    http://sapphireeyesproductions.blogspot.com/

    What chemicals and heavy metals are in South Australia’s drinking water? Here is Freedom of Information Analysis sheets, for the chemicals in South Australia’s water from 2006 to 2010. This includes data (during differing months) that may not be that, ‘palatable’ ie. Aluminium @ 71 mg/l; Arsenic @ 5.2 mg/l; Iodine @ 500 mg/l; Lead @ 2 mg/l; URANIUM at 2mg/l. Yum? ‘Healthy’? ‘Clean’? ‘Safe’? Note WHERE the chemical COMES FROM (August, 2010) ie. Shanghai, China.

  4. ABSOLUTE PROOF FLUORIDE KILLS ! – Footage of fluoride damaging cells and stopping
    This time lapse film was shot by Dr. John Ott, a pioneer in light therapy as well as time lapse photography. Dr. Ott was said to have done many films for the American Dental Association before he did this one for a different client. He was threatened and pressured and had to back away from this particular film. The narrator, Dr. Jonathan Forman of Ohio, voluntarily resigned from leadership positions on medical boards after the establishment got upset. A scientific lab did the work under contract. The main objection from the establishment was that “mice are not men.” The film shows mouse connective tissue cells being exposed to 1 part in 20 million fluoride. The cells slow down, shrink, and die. The experimenters thought that this level of fluoride represented the amount of fluoride in blood with a fluoridation level of 1.2 ppm F. The experimenters found similar results with even lower levels ( 1 in 60 million) of fluoride. To my knowledge, no one else has ever done a film like this. Doug Cragoe

  5. Industrial Fluoride Pollution: A Historical Perspective

    Ferndale WA.This is where i lived for 8mo. helping to open a hardware store. The county of Whatcom is currently fluoridation free.

  6. Poisoned Horses
    Justus’s horses are found to be suffering from chronic fluoride poisoning from drinking fluoridated water. Study published in peer reviewed scientific literature

  7. Dr Michael Breneman

    If flouride was actually beneficial then why are there more and more dentists instead of less and less?! Get the “F” out of our water….and our toothpaste!

  8. Thanks Augie, for posting this powerful article. In our community it was the dentists and physicians who “went” to the authorities and demanded fluoride be put in the water. That is how it played out in the ’50’s and I often I wonder about a planned campaign by the ADA and AMA – to get fluoride into the water= what went into their coffers? I know there was an article published by the AMA prior to this time stating that they knew little about fluoride. In the 30s and 40s these same ‘authorities’ were demonizing fluoride but all of a sudden, a miracle! It was a health product! An ad in the journal of the ADA American Dental Association proudly proclaimed that in communities where fluoride was in the water, the business increased 20%- t
    Bernays was employed by the government I believe to sell fluoride to the public- the original spin doctor knew well that the public trusted their doctors and dentists. He used them also to see cigarettes! “Even your doctor smokes Camels.”

    When I went to the water authority to get this information through Freedom of Information, I saw that the staff was separated from the public by a kind of security window.

    Did the article mention the amount of fluoride generated by the atomic energy research in the 40’s and how much fluoride is sprayed on Florida every time the Space Shuttle and similar space craft are launched?

    Sylvia

  9. I have the ugliest teeth possible. My mother gave me fluoride drops as a kid. I don’t know if she gave me too many or if i’m genetically predisposed to problems with them, but i have had issues my entire life. My baby teeth turned black and began to rot. I don’t remember ever having much energy as a kid. People would say how good exercise made them feel and i thought they were crazy.

    At 16 i had a fluoride treatment at the dentist. I don’t know if they gave me too much or i’m predisposed, but i was very, very ill. Looking back now i believe many of my problems were intensified at that time (chronic fatigue and insomnia) and continue to this day. When i sought treatment, the doctors told me i was “just depressed” and eventually put me on anti-depressants, none of which worked and several, i know now, were fluoride-based.

    I eventually weaned myself off drugs by changing my life style – healthy diet and personal care products, changes in the kitchen ridding it of non-stick cookware and aluminum. But i got an infection almost 4 years ago. I was given Cipro, and i took it not knowing a better way. I did not realize it was fluoride-based nor the problems it could create.

    I have never fully recovered since that time. I am more able than many folks with Chronic Fatigue and Immune Deficiency Syndrome, but i still am very limited in what i can do. I’m giving up hope that i will ever recover and am focused on making the most of what i still have. I will NEVER take another fluoride-based med (and many docs don’t know what i’m talking about when i tell them i cannot have them) and to the best of my ability i don’t use any drugs, not even OTC ones, for any reason.

    Fluoride does more than kill and make ugly teeth – it can rob those of us still breathing of anything like a normal life. It is criminal that it is still being used. I was shocked when i put “symptoms of fluoride . . . ” into a search engine recently. I meant to finish with “toxicity” of course, but it came up with suggestions and “deficiency” was one. As if anyone could be deficient in this!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s